Adherence patterns in naïve and prevalent use of infliximab and its biosimilar

Chibuike J Alanaeme; Sujith Sarvesh; Cynthia Y Li; Sasha Bernatsky; Jeffrey R Curtis; Huifeng Yun

doi:10.1186/s41927-022-00295-7

Adherence patterns in naïve and prevalent use of infliximab and its biosimilar

BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Nov 1;6(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00295-7.

Authors

Chibuike J Alanaeme¹, Sujith Sarvesh², Cynthia Y Li³, Sasha Bernatsky⁴, Jeffrey R Curtis⁵, Huifeng Yun⁶

Affiliations

¹ Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
² Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, USA.
³ Indian Springs School, Pelham, AL, USA.
⁴ Divisions of Rheumatology and Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
⁵ Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
⁶ Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA. yunn@uab.edu.

Abstract

Introduction: Although short-term clinical trials have demonstrated that switching from infliximab (INF) bio-originator to its biosimilar is safe with no significant loss of efficacy, there are limited real-world data comparing their patterns of use and adherence.

Methods: Using 2015-2018 IBM Marketscan data, we established 4 cohorts of patients with at least one administration or pharmacy claim for INF bio-originator or biosimilar in 2017, including INF naïve biosimilar users, INF prevalent biosimilar users, INF naïve bio-originator users, and INF prevalent bio-originator users, defined according to their prior use of INF from 2015 to their first INF administration in 2017. The proportion of days covered (PDC) was calculated for patients with at least 6, 12, or 18 months of follow-up time. Factors associated with optimal adherence (PDC > 80%) were evaluated using log-binomial models.

Results: We identified 96 INF naïve biosimilar users, 223 INF prevalent biosimilar users, 2,149 INF naïve bio-originator users, and 10,970 INF prevalent bio-originator users. At the end of 18 months of follow-up, 64% of INF prevalent bio-originators, 48% of INF naïve biosimilars, 41% of INF naïve bio-originators, and 36% of INF prevalent biosimilars had optimal adherence. Depression, previous hospitalization, and greater use of prior biologics were negatively associated with adherence, whereas IBD diagnoses (referent to RA) and age 55-64 (referent to < 35) were positively associated with high adherence.

Conclusion: INF prevalent users had higher adherence in our analyses than INF naïve users. However, further studies with larger sample size are needed to evaluate INF biosimilar users' adherence.

Keywords: Adherence; Autoimmune diseases; Biosimilar; Infliximab.