Extended Knee Control programme lowers weekly hamstring, knee and ankle injury prevalence compared with an adductor strength programme or self-selected injury prevention exercises in adolescent and adult amateur football players: a two-armed cluster-randomised trial with an additional comparison arm

Br J Sports Med. 2023 Jan;57(2):83-90. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105890. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the preventive efficacy of an extended version of the Knee Control injury prevention exercise programme (IPEP) compared with an adductor strength programme and to a comparison group using a self-selected IPEP in amateur adolescent and adult male and female football players.

Methods: Two-armed cluster-randomised trial with an additional non-randomised arm. All 251 amateur teams (players 14-46 years) in one regional football district were approached. Teams meeting inclusion criteria were randomised to (1) extended Knee Control or (2) an adductor strength programme. Teams already using an IPEP were allocated to a comparison group and received no new intervention. Players responded to weekly questionnaires about football exposures and injuries during a 7-month season.

Results: Seventeen teams in the extended Knee Control, 12 in the adductor and 17 in the comparison group participated, with 502 players. For the primary outcomes, no difference in injury incidence in three lower-limb injury locations combined (hamstring, knee and ankle) was seen between extended Knee Control and the adductor group, whereas extended Knee Control had 29% lower incidence than the comparison group (incidence rate ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.98). No between-group differences in groin injury incidence were seen. The weekly injury prevalence rates in the three lower limb locations combined (hamstring, knee and ankle) were 17% lower (prevalence rate ratio (PRR) 0.83, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.00) and 26% lower (PRR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.87) in extended Knee Control compared with the adductor and comparison groups, respectively.

Conclusion: No difference in injury incidence was seen between the extended Knee Control and the adductor programme whereas extended Knee Control reduced injury incidence by nearly one-third compared with a self-selected IPEP. Players in extended Knee Control had lower injury prevalence compared with an adductor or self-selected IPEP.

Trial registration number: NCT04272047; Clinical trials.

Keywords: Athletic Injuries; Lower extremity; Preventive Medicine; Soccer; Sporting injuries.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Ankle Injuries* / epidemiology
  • Ankle Injuries* / prevention & control
  • Athletic Injuries* / epidemiology
  • Athletic Injuries* / prevention & control
  • Exercise Therapy
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Knee Injuries*
  • Lower Extremity / injuries
  • Male
  • Prevalence
  • Soccer* / injuries

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT04272047