Aim: Bleeding during spine surgery is controlled using topical hemostatic agents. Studies have reported outcomes between Surgiflo® and Floseal, the most widely used flowable hemostatic matrices, but have not included the latest Surgiflo formulation which is more adherent to the bleeding surface than prior formulations. Materials & methods: A propensity score-matched analysis was conducted using the Premier Healthcare Database to compare economic and clinical outcomes of adults undergoing inpatient spinal surgery between 2013 and 2018 receiving current Surgiflo or Floseal. Results: This retrospective study included 28,910 patients in each group and found comparable outcomes for bleeding events, overall transfusion rate, inpatient mortality and readmissions between Surgiflo and Floseal. Surgiflo was associated with $430 (USD) lower hospitalization costs, shorter length of stay and shorter operating room time than Floseal.
Keywords: Floseal; Surgiflo®; bleeding; economic outcomes; spinal surgery; transfusion.
Topical hemostatic agents such as Surgiflo® and Floseal are used during invasive surgery to manage bleeding. We compared outcomes of spine surgeries that used either of two most frequently used topical hemostatic agents, Surgiflo or Floseal. This is the largest retrospective study presenting economic and clinical outcomes of patients receiving Surgiflo versus Floseal during spine surgery using the latest product formulations. The study suggests that clinical outcomes are comparable between Surgiflo and Floseal groups and that Surgiflo is associated with lower hospitalization costs, slightly shorter hospital stay and shorter operating room time among patients undergoing spine surgery.