Does veno-arterial carbon dioxide gradient provide an adequate estimation of cardiac index in pulmonary hypertension?

Abstract

Aims: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) management is dependent on cardiac output (CO) assessment. The gold standard Fick method for CO and cardiac index (CI) measurement is not widely available. An accessible and reliable method for CO/CI estimation is needed not only in catheterization labs but also in other environments such as the intensive care unit, where pulmonary artery catheters are less likely to be used. We hypothesized that veno-arterial carbon dioxide gradient (PvaCO2) is a reliable surrogate for Fick CI in patients with PH.

Methods and results: A single-centre retrospective analysis of patients with PH who underwent direct Fick CI (DFCI) measurement during right heart catheterization. The primary outcome was correlation between PvaCO2 and DFCI. To assess the agreement between central and mixed venous CO2 values, a separate prospective cohort of patients was analysed. Data from 186 patients with all haemodynamic types of PH were analysed. PvaCO2 moderately correlated with Fick CI, R = -0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.61, -0.39]. A higher PvaCO2 was associated with an increased risk of CI < 2.5 L/min/m2 (odds ratio: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.55, 2.35). Low thermodilution CI with normal veno-arterial carbon dioxide gradient values was associated with a thermodilution underestimation of Fick CI. In the prospective analysis of 32 patients, central venous CO2 overestimated mixed venous values (mean difference 3.3, 95% CI: 2.5, 4.0) and there was poor agreement overall (limits of agreement -1.10, 7.59).

Conclusion: Veno-arterial carbon dioxide gradient moderately correlates with Fick CI and may be useful to identify patients with low CI. Central and mixed venous CO2 values should not be used interchangeably in PH.

Keywords: Cardiac output; Haemodynamics; Pulmonary hypertension; Veno-arterial carbon dioxide gradient.