Length of Hospitalization-Related Differences and Associated Long-Term Prognosis of Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort

J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Oct 15;9(10):354. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9100354.

Abstract

Previous studies indicated that prolonged lengths of hospitalization (LOH) during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation are associated with poorer physical status and higher in-hospital mortality. However, evidence on the impact of LOH on the long-term prognosis of CRT patients is limited. The purpose of this study was to assess LOH-related prognostic differences in CRT patients. In the propensity score-matched cohort, patients with standard LOH (≤7 days, n = 172) were compared with those with prolonged LOH (>7 days, n = 172) for cardiac function and study outcomes during follow-up. The study outcomes were all-cause death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. In addition, cardiac function and changes in cardiac function at the follow-up period were used for comparison. At a mean follow-up of 3.36 years, patients with prolonged LOH, as compared with those with standard LOH, were associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18−2.96, p = 0.007), and a higher risk of HF hospitalization (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.08−2.63, p = 0.023). Moreover, patients with standard LOH had a more significant improvement in cardiac function and a pronounced reduction in QRS duration during follow-up than those with prolonged LOH. LOH-associated differences were found in the long-term prognosis of CRT patients. Patients with prolonged LOH had a worse prognosis than those with standard LOH.

Keywords: cardiac resynchronization therapy; death; heart failure; lengths of hospitalization; long-term prognosis.