Background: Sufficient and diverse medical countermeasures against severe pathogenic infections, such as inhalation anthrax, are a critical need. Azithromycin and clarithromycin are antimicrobials commonly used for both upper and lower respiratory infections. They inhibit protein synthesis by blocking the formation of the 50S ribosomal subunit. To expand the armamentarium, these 2 antibiotics were evaluated in a postexposure prophylactic model of inhalation anthrax in cynomolgus macaques.
Methods: This prophylaxis study had 4 test arms: azithromycin, clarithromycin, a levofloxacin control, and a placebo. Beginning 24 hours after exposure to a target challenge dose of 200 lethal dose 50 (LD50) of Bacillus anthracis Ames spores, animals were treated orally until 30 days postchallenge and then observed until 75 days postchallenge.
Results: The test group that received clarithromycin had a survival rate of 67%. The test group that received azithromycin had a survival rate of 50%, but the peak azithromycin plasma levels achieved were <30 ng/mL-much lower than the expected 410 ng/mL. The levofloxacin positive control had a survival rate of 50%; all of the negative controls succumbed to infection.
Conclusions: The efficacy of clarithromycin prophylaxis was statistically significant compared with placebo, while azithromycin prophylaxis was indistinguishable from placebo. Given the low plasma concentrations of azithromycin achieved in the study, it is not surprising that half the animals succumbed to anthrax during the dosing period; the animals that survived beyond the time during which placebo control animals succumbed survived to the end of the observation period.
Keywords: azithromycin; clarithromycin; inhalation anthrax; nonhuman primates; postexposure prophylaxis.
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.