Purpose: To prove the utility of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging response as a surrogate end point of treatment efficacy and survival after yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), and to investigate whether outcomes can be predicted at baseline using MR imaging or clinical variables.
Materials and methods: A total of 50 (135) patients with TARE for CRLMs between August 2008 and January 2020 and peri-interventional MR imaging within defined timeframes were included for tumor segmentation. Pretreatment and posttreatment target tumor volumes were measured according to the volumetric Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (vRECIST) and the quantitative European Association for the Study of the Liver (qEASL) criteria. Cox regression models were used to analyze the impact of MR morphologic response, vascularity at baseline, and clinical variables on patient survival. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the predictors of MR morphologic response at baseline.
Results: The median survival was 337 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 243-431). As opposed to the vRECIST, the application of the qEASL criteria 3 months after the treatment allowed for a significant (P < .05) separation of the survival curves for partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease with a median survival of 412 days (95% CI, 57-767) in responders. High tumor burden and technetium-99m lung shunt significantly decreased the probability of survival. MR morphologic response was not predictable at baseline using imaging or clinical data.
Conclusions: MR response according to the qEASL criteria outperformed the vRECIST in measuring the biologic impact of TARE and predicting patient survival. Baseline contrast enhancement did not predict MR response to treatment, which may reflect elevated dose requirements in tumors with a high proportion of viable tumor volume.
Copyright © 2022 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.