What's data got to do with it? A scoping review of data used as evidence in policies promoting the health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in the Northern Territory, Australia

Abstract

Issue addressed: Accurate data on the health of Australia's First Nations peoples is critical in determining appropriate public health programs and establishing a baseline against which to measure progress. The effective translation of evidence into practice continues to be a challenge for Australian health departments and policymakers. The objective of this scoping review was to (i) determine the extent and range of policies relevant to the health and well-being of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in the Northern Territory (NT); to (ii) identify what data is reported to be used as evidence to reconcile policy goals with outcomes, (iii) to describe issues acknowledged by policy makers relating to data availability and/or limitations, and to (iv) examine how principles of Indigenous inclusion and self-determination are included in these policies.

Methods: A search for current policy documents, strategic plans/initiatives or frameworks was conducted across Ovid Medline, PubMed, Informit, Scopus, in addition to a web-based search for grey literature. Current policy documents for the period 2010-2021 were included providing at least one of the goals or objectives were relevant to the health and well-being of Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from the NT.

Results: The search located 2610 unique citations. Full-text screening was conducted on 85 documents, a total of 49 policy documents or strategic plans/frameworks were included in the final synthesis. The source of data being used as evidence was unclear or absent in 10 of the 49 (20.4%) identified policy documents. Limitations of the available data were mentioned to some extent, but detailed information on quality and completeness was largely absent. In mapping the key principles of working in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health contexts, only two policies articulated the need for information sharing and data governance.

Conclusions: This review underscores the importance of providing clear information about which data is being used to inform policy decisions so that they may be evaluated and critiqued in meaningful ways that ensure decision makers are accountable. SO WHAT?: Specific data items and/or indicators should be explicitly referenced as evidence used in the development of policies promoting the health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and their communities from the outset so that evaluation is clear and policy makers are held accountable.

Keywords: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders; children; evidence-based practice; health policy; systematic review.