This study aimed to assess the risks and benefits of selective clamping in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We retrospectively analyzed 372 patients who had undergone RAPN at our hospital between July 2010 and March 2021. After propensity score matching between the full and selective clamping groups, perioperative outcomes and postoperative preservation ratio of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were compared at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. After propensity score matching, we evaluated 47 patients from each group. While no significant differences were observed in surgical time, warm ischemia time, or incidence rates of all grades of complications between the two cohorts, the estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower in the full clamping group than in the selective clamping group (30 vs. 60, p = 0.046). However, no significant intergroup differences were observed in the postoperative preservation ratio of eGFR at 6 or 12 months of follow-up (full clamping 94.0% vs. selective clamping 92.7%, p = 0.509, and full clamping 92.0% vs. selective clamping 91.6%, p = 0.476, respectively). Selective clamping resulted in higher EBL rates than did full clamping in RAPN. However, selective clamping provided no renal functional advantage over full clamping in our propensity-score-matched cohort.
Keywords: estimated glomerular filtration rate; robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; selective clamping.