Difference analysis of phenomenological models with two variable forms for soft tissue quasi-static mechanical characterization

Abstract

It was important to understand the accurate mechanical properties of soft tissue for the evaluation of its injury, provide reliable protective ways or design effective human resist-injury devices. There was little study that clarified the difference between phenomenological models based on strain invariant and the principal stretches variables respectively although some quasi-static constitutive models of soft tissue were developed. In this study, we enumerate several typical hyperelastic models and derive the tensor equation of stress-strain based on continuum mechanics to fit the experimental data of human brain specimens under multiple loading modes in previous studies and give the coefficient of determination based on the least square fitting. It was suggested that two variable forms of phenomenological models with only the first strain invariant are consistent under uniaxial compression and tension, but the Cauchy stress tensor expressed by strain is completely different under simple shear loading. Also, the shear stress derived from the constitutive model based on strain invariants and principal stretchs has multiple relationships related to shear strain. The results in this study would be used to understand the more accurate mechanical characterization of soft tissue, which will allow us to evaluate the injury and develop much accurate injury criteria for soft tissue.

Keywords: Biomechanics; Phenomenological models; Principal stretches; Quasi-static experiment; Strain invariant.