Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Biofeedback Electrical Stimulation Combined with Doxycycline in the Treatment of Type IIIA Chronic Prostatitis

Xiaoyong Sun; Tangtang Lin; Jinying Fang; Jinming Liu; Wenliang Yao; Liguo Geng; Jinfeng Zhang

doi:10.1155/2022/7150204

Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Biofeedback Electrical Stimulation Combined with Doxycycline in the Treatment of Type IIIA Chronic Prostatitis

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Sep 28:2022:7150204. doi: 10.1155/2022/7150204. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Xiaoyong Sun¹, Tangtang Lin¹, Jinying Fang¹, Jinming Liu¹, Wenliang Yao², Liguo Geng³, Jinfeng Zhang⁴

Affiliations

¹ Department of Chinese Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China.
² Department of Andrology, Nanchang Reproductive Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330000, China.
³ Department of Andrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai Hospital, Zhuhai, Guangdong 519000, China.
⁴ Department of Anorectal, Ganzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China.

Abstract

Purpose: To analyse the clinical efficacy of biofeedback electrical stimulation combined with doxycycline in the treatment of type IIIA chronic prostatitis.

Methods: Eighty patients who met the diagnostic criteria of type IIIA chronic prostatitis in our hospital between February 2020 and February 2022 were selected and equally divided into the drug group and electrical stimulation group according to the random number table method. The drug group was treated with medication alone for 4 weeks; the electrostimulation group was treated with biofeedback electrostimulation on top of medication for 12 weeks. The expressed prostatic secretious (EPS) routine (lecithin bodies, white blood cells) and the maximum urinary flow rate (Q _max) and mean urinary flow rate (Q _ave) were measured before and after treatment in both groups, and the National Institutes of Health chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) was used to score the urinary symptom, pain or discomfort, and quality of life and determine the efficacy of the treatment in both groups.

Results: After treatment, the number of lecithin bodies and white blood cells in EPS improved significantly in both groups compared to before, and both the electrical stimulation group was better than the drug group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the Q _max and Q _ave were significantly higher in both groups than before, and both the electrical stimulation groups were higher than the drug group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the urinary symptom scores, pain or discomfort scores, quality of life scores, and total NIH-CPSI scores were significantly lower in both groups than before, and all were lower in the electrical stimulation group than in the drug group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the overall efficiency of patients in the electrical stimulation group was significantly higher than that of the drug group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Biofeedback electrical stimulation combined with doxycycline in the treatment of type IIIA chronic prostatitis can synergistically improve the patient's inflammation level, urinary dysfunction, relieve pelvic floor tension myalgia, and improve their quality of life, opening up new avenues for the rehabilitation of patients with type IIIA chronic prostatitis.

Publication types

Retracted Publication