Comparative mitogenomic analyses and gene rearrangements reject the alleged polyphyly of a bivalve genus

PeerJ. 2022 Sep 26:10:e13953. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13953. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Background: The order and orientation of genes encoded by animal mitogenomes are typically conserved, although there is increasing evidence of multiple rearrangements among mollusks. The mitogenome from a Brazilian brown mussel (hereafter named B1) classified as Perna perna Linnaeus, 1758 and assembled from Illumina short-length reads revealed an unusual gene order very different from other congeneric species. Previous mitogenomic analyses based on the Brazilian specimen and other Mytilidae suggested the polyphyly of the genus Perna.

Methods: To confirm the proposed gene rearrangements, we sequenced a second Brazilian P. perna specimen using the "primer-walking" method and performed the assembly using as reference Perna canaliculus. This time-consuming sequencing method is highly effective when assessing gene order because it relies on sequentially-determined, overlapping fragments. We also sequenced the mitogenomes of eastern and southwestern South African P. perna lineages to analyze the existence of putative intraspecific gene order changes as the two lineages show overlapping distributions but do not exhibit a sister relationship.

Results: The three P. perna mitogenomes sequenced in this study exhibit the same gene order as the reference. CREx, a software that heuristically determines rearrangement scenarios, identified numerous gene order changes between B1 and our P. perna mitogenomes, rejecting the previously proposed gene order for the species. Our results validate the monophyly of the genus Perna and indicate a misidentification of B1.

Keywords: Gene rearrangements; Mitogenomics; Perna perna; Polyphyly; Primer-walking.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Base Sequence
  • Brazil
  • Genome, Mitochondrial* / genetics
  • Mytilidae* / genetics
  • Perna*

Grants and funding

Regina L. Cunha was funded by the transitional norm—DL 57/2016/CP1361/CT0013. This study received Portuguese national funds from FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology through project UIDB/04326/2020, and from the operational programmes CRESC Algarve 2020 and COMPETE 2020 through projects EMBRC.PT ALG-01-0145-FEDER-022121 and BIODATA.PT ALG-01-0145-FEDER-022231. This research was further supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT—MEC, Portugal (Grant Number: EXPL/BIA-BMA/0682/2021)), and the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant Number: 64801). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.