Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margin status as a quality indicator in gastric cancer surgery

J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jan;127(1):66-72. doi: 10.1002/jso.27107. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

Abstract

Introduction: Positive pathologic margins following gastric cancer (GC) resection carries a poor prognosis. We evaluated intraoperative frozen section (IFS) analysis of resection margins (RMs) as a quality indicator in GC surgery.

Methods: Patients referred to a provincial cancer agency with surgically resected non-metastatic GC between 2004 and 2012 were included. Associations between IFS analysis, other baseline characteristics, RMs, and overall survival (OS) were assessed using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analyses, and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results: Among 377 patients, median age was 67 years, 68% were male, and 16% had +RMs. Thirty-four percent of patients underwent IFS analysis, which protected against +RMs (odds ratio [OR]: 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-0.73, p = 0.006) and improved OS (hazards ratio [HR]: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.98, p = 0.037). OS following re-resection of IFS positive patients was similar to IFS negative patients (69 vs. 54 months, p = 0.317). Stage III disease (OR: 12.8, 95% CI: 3.00-55.0, p = 0.001) and gastroesophageal junction tumors (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.05-4.78, p = 0.036) predicted +RMs. Stage III disease led to worse OS (HR: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.92-4.34, p < 0.001) while intestinal histology improved OS (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.50-0.90, p = 0.007).

Conclusions: IFS analysis reduce +RMs and improve OS and should be incorporated in curative intent GC surgery for patients with locally advanced GC.

Keywords: frozen sections; gastrectomy; gastric cancer; margins of excision.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Esophagogastric Junction / pathology
  • Female
  • Frozen Sections
  • Gastrectomy
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Margins of Excision
  • Prognosis
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stomach Neoplasms* / pathology