Introduction: General practitioner (GP) training programme involves a complex process. In Italy, unlike in other European countries, there is no national core curriculum for the training of GPs and the three-year specific training course in General Medicine (CSFMG) is not equated as a proper specialty. Furthermore, the quality of the CFSMGs is poorly investigated and data are difficult to find/fragment. The aim of this study is to describe and compare GP tranining from two pilot regions (Lombardy and Lazio).
Methods: The study analysed the white and grey literature. For data collection a descriptive grid was created using the characteristics foreseen by current legislation as comparison indicators; the information came exclusively from official and public written data.
Results: The analysis reports indicators: structural-organisational; theoretical activity; practical activity; research/guided study; final thesis.
Discussion: The most evident fact that emerges is the lack of available (show the gap), public and official information on the GP training, therefore the description and comparison of the basic indicators in the pilot Regions suffers. A learning model based more on minimum time requirements (time-based learning) than on competences to be acquired (competencies-based learning) is evident. Furthermore, the professional/academic profiles of the lecturers are not available and thus comparable; finally, no information on the training methodologies of the frontal/research sessions can be found.
Conclusions: The limitation to only two Regions and the lack of available data do not allow a comprehensive assessment and it would be useful to extend the study on a national scale. However, there is a clear need for improved transparency and evaluation within the GP's training in different Regions through a periodic monitoring system with specific indicators (quantitative and qualitative). The re-establishment/establishment of an independent national observatory on Training in General Practice would be desirable.