"Post- Roe" Abortion Policy Context Heightens the Imperative for Multilevel, Comprehensive, Integrated Health Education

Health Educ Behav. 2022 Dec;49(6):913-918. doi: 10.1177/10901981221125399. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

Abstract

The exceptionalism of abortion in public health education, due to social stigma, politicization, and lack of training, contributes to misinformation, policies unjustified by rigorous science, lack of access to person-centered health care, and systemic pregnancy-related inequities. Now that abortion access has vanished for large portions of the United States, following the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (JWHO), health educators must work to eliminate abortion-related silos, destigmatize abortion education, and bring comprehensive sexual and reproductive health information and evidence to the many audiences that will require it. We discuss consequences of abortion exceptionalism in health education for the public, health care providers, pregnant people, and health professionals in training-and opportunities to better and more accessibly provide sexual and reproductive health education to these audiences.

Keywords: comprehensive health education; evidence-based practice; family planning; health care disparities; pregnancy; stigma.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Health Education
  • Humans
  • Policy*
  • Pregnancy
  • Supreme Court Decisions*
  • United States