Exploring behaviours perceived as important for human-Dog bonding and their translation to a robotic platform

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0274353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274353. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

To facilitate long-term engagement with social robots, emerging evidence suggests that modelling robots on social animals with whom many people form enduring social bonds-specifically, pet dogs-may be useful. However, scientific understanding of the features of pet dogs that are important for establishing and maintaining social bonds remains limited to broad qualities that are liked, as opposed to specific behaviours. To better understand dog behaviours that are perceived as important for facilitating social bonds between owner and pet, we surveyed current dog owners (n = 153) with open-ended questions about their dogs' behaviours. Thematic analysis identified 7 categories of behaviours perceived as important to human-dog bonding, including: 1) attunement, 2) communication, 3) consistency and predictability, 4) physical affection, 5) positivity and enthusiasm, 6) proximity, and 7) shared activities. We consider the feasibility of translating these behaviours into a social robotic platform, and signpost potential barriers moving forward. In addition to providing insight into important behaviours for human-dog bonding, this work provides a springboard for those hoping to implement dog behaviours into animal-like artificial agents designed for social roles.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Dogs
  • Emotions
  • Human-Animal Bond
  • Humans
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures*
  • Robotics*

Grants and funding

This work has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon2020 research and innovation programme (grant agree- ment number ERC-2015-StG-677270-SOCIALROBOTS to ESC), the Leverhulme Trust (PLP-2018-152 to ESC) and an Industrial Strategy PhD studentship from the Economic and Social Research Council (grant number 1945868 to KR and ESC). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.