Can academic dentistry become an anti-racist institution?: Addressing racial battle fatigue and building belonging

J Dent Educ. 2022 Sep;86(9):1075-1082. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13025.

Abstract

Racism, oppression, and marginalization are unfortunate hallmarks that Black individuals face in the United States. While dental schools serve as institutions of both learning and patient care, applying humanistic principles, they are not immune to racism, specifically anti-Black racism. In this paper, the theoretical framework of racial battle fatigue is applied to academic dentistry to consider how it may impact faculty who have experiences with racism and discrimination. The framework of racial battle fatigue allows for a critique of academic dentistry as an institution that may be toxic, neither welcoming Black faculty members nor supporting their professional and career advancement, despite accreditation standards that call on these institutions to be humanistic environments for diversity and inclusion. Black faculty members may face unique challenges in academic dentistry because of racial battle fatigue. The cumulative stress may warrant unique strategies to both recruit and retain them in academic dental institutions. Specifically, pathways may need to be funded to insure that they have support and time allocations for professional development and career promotion. With understanding the effects of racial battle fatigue, dental schools may want to adopt policies and practices that support the professional and personal well-being and success of faculty, especially those faculty members who are Black.

Keywords: dental education; mental health; microaggression; racism; trauma.

MeSH terms

  • Dentistry
  • Fatigue
  • Humanism
  • Humans
  • Racial Groups*
  • Racism*
  • United States