Clinical Outcomes after One-day or Two-day Intervals in Conditioning Regimens for allo-HCT

Abstract

One-day or two-day intervals are generally inserted into scheduled conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, primarily due to various social circumstances, such as unexpected natural adversities, abrupt deterioration of patient health, and delays in graft source arrival. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with interrupted conditioning with those with ordinarily scheduled conditioning. We analyzed 83 patients (children and adolescents) with oncologic disease who underwent myeloablative conditioning with total body irradiation. Overall and event-free survival were similar between the groups ( P =0.955, P =0.908, respectively). Non-relapse mortality and relapse rates were similar between the groups ( P =0.923, P =0.946, respectively). The engraftment rate was not affected by interruption ( P =1.000). In contrast, the incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was higher in the interrupted group compared with the scheduled group, although there was no statistical significance (42% vs. 19%, P =0.063). Conditioning interruption was identified to be an independent risk factor for chronic GVHD by multivariate analysis (odds ratio: 3.72; 95% CI: 1.04 to 13.3; P =0.043). In conclusion, apart from the incidence of chronic GVHD, clinical outcomes were not affected by one-day or two-day intervals during conditioning.