A comparison of SRK/T formula with Hill RBF 2 and Barrett Universal II in the calculation of intraocular lens power

J Pak Med Assoc. 2022 Jul;72(7):1373-1377. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.3842.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the accuracy of SRK/T, Barrett Universal II and Hill radial basis activation function-2 formulas in intraocular lens power calculation using different axial lengths.

Methods: The retrospective study was conducted at the Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised data from June to December 2020 of patients who underwent phacoemulsification with non-toric, monofocal intraocular lens implantation. Data was sorted in 3 groups on the basis of axial length; group 1 22-25mm, group 2>25mm, and group 3 <22mm. Intraocular lens power was calculated using SRK/T with IOL Master, while online calculators were used for Barrett Universal II and Hill radial basis activation function-2 formulas. Data was analysed using SPSS 21.

Results: Of the 100 patients, 47(347%) were males and 53(53%) were females. There were 49(49%) diabetics, and 57(57%) were right eyes. There were 77(77%) patients with mean age 62.38±9.5 in group 1, 17(17%) patients with mean age 52.59±12.78 in group 2, and 6(6%) patients with mean age 61.33+7.61 years in group 3. Mean axial length in group 1 was 23.55±0.81mm with anterior chamber depth of 3.1± 0.37mm. In group 2, mean axial length was 27.54±2.8mm, with anterior chamber depth of 3.4±0.15mm. In group 3, mean axial length was 21.74mm, with anterior chamber depth of 3.14±0.44mm. Mean prediction error of SRK/T versus Barrett Universal II was 0.092±0.041D (p=0.078), SRK/T versus Hill radial basis activation function-2 was 0.066±0.037D (p=0.221) and Barrett Universal versus Hill radial basis activation function-2 was -0.025±0.019D (p=0.553). Mean prediction error of group 1 versus group 2 was -0.105±0.14D, group 2 versus group 3 was 0.046±0.216D and group 2 versus group 3 was 0.151±0.243D (p=1.0). In 74% eyes, absolute prediction error was within ±0.5D in group 1, 64% in group 2 and 50% in group 3 for all formulas.

Conclusions: SRK/T formula was found to be as reliable as Barrett Universal II and Hill radial basis activation function-2 in terms of calculating intra ocular lens power for all axial lengths.

Keywords: Cataract, Intraocular lens, Phacoemulsification, Biometry, SRK/T, Barrett Universal II, Hill RBF2..

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Biometry
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lenses, Intraocular*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Optics and Photonics
  • Refraction, Ocular
  • Retrospective Studies