Introduction: The HyFlex course structure allows students to attend class in-person or via synchronous videoconferencing technology. This model has been described, but no data are available in pharmacy curricula.
Methods: Students enrolled in Grand Rounds (GR) were eligible. The GR Engagement Assessment Tool (GREAT) measured engagement three times during the semester. Eighteen statements across four domains were rated using a five-point Likert scale (1 = not true at all and 5 = completely true). Free-text responses were collected for qualitative analysis. The primary outcome was the difference in GR engagement between students attending in-person vs. remotely. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic information. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests compared Likert-scale responses between in-person and remote attendance.
Results: Surveys included 128 responses from 88 unique students. There were no differences between remote and in-person attendance for the boredom and elaboration domains. In-person students reported listening more intently (median 4, IQR [3,4]; P = .03). In-person students felt the material was more practical (median 4, IQR [4,5]) than remote students (median 4, IQR [3,4]; P = .002) and more applicable to other situations (median 3, IQR [3,5]) than remote students (median 3, IQR [2,4]; P = .04). Qualitative analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated five themes for satisfaction: safety, flexibility, convenience, technology, and professionalism.
Conclusions: There were subtle differences in student engagement or satisfaction using the HyFlex model. This study supports the expansion of this methodology to similar courses where remote instruction is needed.
Keywords: Capstone; Engagement; Grand rounds; HyFlex; Hybrid.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.