Efficacy of Entomopathogenic Fungal Formulations against Elasmolomus pallens (Dallas) (Hemiptera: Rhyparochromidae) and Their Extracellular Enzymatic Activities

Toxins (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;14(9):584. doi: 10.3390/toxins14090584.

Abstract

Elasmolomus pallens are post-harvest insect pests of peanuts that are becoming resistant to chemical insecticides. In this, we study evaluated the effect of conidial formulations on entomopathogenic fungi against E. pallens to reduce the adverse effects. Fungal conidia were formulated and applied on sterile filter papers at varying concentrations (1 × 104-1 × 108 conidia mL-1) inside plastic containers. The test insects were exposed and maintained in a relative humidity of 80 ± 10% for 10 d at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C). Mortality was recorded every 24 h. Dose-response bioassay (LC50 and LC90) values for Aspergillus flavus formulated in oil were 1.95 × 106 and 3.66 × 109 conidia/mL, whereas formulations in Tween 80 had 9.36 × 107 and 6.50 × 109 conidia/mL. However, oil-formulated Metarhizium anisopliae had 3.92 × 106 and 2.57 × 108 conidia/mL, with 6.85 × 106 and 5.37 × 108, for formulations in Tween 80. A. flavus had LT50 values of 3.3 and 6.6 days, whereas M. anisopliae had LT50 values of 3.6 and 5.7 d. Maximum protease, chitinase, and lipase activities of 2.51, 0.98, and 3.22 U/mL, respectively, were recorded for A. flavus, whereas values of 2.43, 0.93, and 3.46 were recorded for M. anisopliae. The investigated pathogens demonstrate potential against E. pallens; therefore, their applicability under field conditions requires further investigation.

Keywords: bioassay; biological control; entomopathogenic fungi; enzyme; oil formulation; seed bug.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Chitinases* / pharmacology
  • Heteroptera*
  • Insecticides* / pharmacology
  • Lipase
  • Peptide Hydrolases
  • Pest Control, Biological
  • Plastics
  • Polysorbates / pharmacology
  • Spores, Fungal

Substances

  • Insecticides
  • Plastics
  • Polysorbates
  • Lipase
  • Chitinases
  • Peptide Hydrolases

Grants and funding

The authors acknowledge the support of the University of Malaya Center of Research Grant Management (PPGP), Grant number PG343 2016A (12 July 2016).