Rapid, novel screening of toxicants in poison baits, and autopsy specimens by ambient mass spectrometry

Alessandra Tata; Ivana Pallante; Carmela Zacometti; Alessandra Moressa; Marco Bragolusi; Alessandro Negro; Andrea Massaro; Giovanni Binato; Federica Gallocchio; Roberto Angeletti; Nicola Pozzato; Roberto Piro

doi:10.3389/fchem.2022.982377

Rapid, novel screening of toxicants in poison baits, and autopsy specimens by ambient mass spectrometry

Front Chem. 2022 Aug 25:10:982377. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.982377. eCollection 2022.

Affiliations

¹ Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Laboratorio di Chimica Sperimentale, Vicenza, Italy.
² Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Laboratorio di Medicina Forense Veterinaria, Vicenza, Italy.
³ Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Chimica, Legnaro, Italy.

Abstract

Animal poisoning and dissemination of baits in the environment have public health and ethological implications, which can be followed by criminal sanctions for those responsible. The reference methods for the analysis of suspect baits and autopsy specimens are founded on chromatographic-based techniques. They are extremely robust and sensitive, but also very expensive and laborious. For this reason, we developed an ambient mass spectrometry (AMS) method able to screen for 40 toxicants including carbamates, organophosphate and chlorinated pesticides, coumarins, metaldehyde, and strychnine. Spiked samples were firstly purified and extracted by dispersive solid phase extraction (QuEChERS) and then analyzed by direct analysis in real time high-resolution mass spectrometry (DART-HRMS). To verify the performance of this new approach, 115 authentic baits (n = 59) and necropsy specimens (gastrointestinal content and liver, n = 56) were assessed by the official reference methods and combined QuEChERS-DART-HRMS. The agreement between the results allowed evaluation of the performances of the new screening method for a variety of analytes and calculation of the resultant statistical indicators (the new method had overall accuracy 89.57%, sensitivity of 88.24%, and a specificity of 91.49%). Taking into account only the baits, 96.61% of overall accuracy was achieved with 57/59 samples correctly identified (statistical sensitivity 97.50%, statistical specificity 94.74%). Successful identification of the bitter compound, denatonium benzoate, in all the samples that contained rodenticides (28/28) was also achieved. We believe initial screening of suspect poison baits could guide the choice of reference confirmatory methods, reduce the load in official laboratories, and help the early stages of investigations into cases of animal poisoning.

Keywords: DART-HRMS; QuEChERS; bitter agent; suspected animal poisoning; toxicology.