Evaluation of minimally invasive sampling methods for detecting Avipoxvirus: Hummingbirds as a case example

Aoife N Galvin; Pranav S Pandit; Simon G English; Rachel C Quock; Ruta R Bandivadekar; Rita R Colwell; Barbara W Robinson; Holly B Ernest; Mollie H Brown; Ravinder N M Sehgal; Lisa A Tell

doi:10.3389/fvets.2022.924854

Evaluation of minimally invasive sampling methods for detecting Avipoxvirus: Hummingbirds as a case example

Front Vet Sci. 2022 Aug 24:9:924854. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.924854. eCollection 2022.

Affiliations

¹ Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, United States.
² EpiCenter for Disease Dynamics, One Health Insititute, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
³ Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
⁴ Hummingbird Monitoring Network, Patagonia, AZ, United States.
⁵ Wildlife Genomics and Disease Ecology Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States.

Abstract

Avian pox is a common avian virus that in its cutaneous form can cause characteristic lesions on a bird's dermal surfaces. Detection of avian pox in free-ranging birds historically relied on observations of visual lesions and/or histopathology, both which can underestimate avian pox prevalence. We compared traditional visual observation methods for avian pox with molecular methods that utilize minimally invasive samples (blood, toenail clipping, feathers, and dermal swabs) in an ecologically important group of birds, hummingbirds. Specifically, avian pox prevalence in several species of hummingbirds were examined across multiple locations using three different methods: (1) visual inspection of hummingbirds for pox-like lesions from a long-term banding data set, (2) qPCR assay of samples from hummingbird carcasses from wildlife rehabilitation centers, and (3) qPCR assay of samples from live-caught hummingbirds. A stark difference in prevalences among these three methods was identified, with an avian pox prevalence of 1.5% from banding data, 20.4% from hummingbird carcasses, and 32.5% from live-caught hummingbirds in California. This difference in detection rates underlines the necessity of a molecular method to survey for avian pox, and this study establishes one such method that could be applied to other wild bird species. Across all three methods, Anna's hummingbirds harbored significantly higher avian pox prevalence than other species examined, as did males compared with females and birds caught in Southern California compared with Northern California. After hatch-year hummingbirds also harbored higher avian pox prevalences than hatch-year hummingbirds in the California banding data set and the carcass data set. This is the first study to estimate the prevalence of avian pox in hummingbirds and address the ecology of this hummingbird-specific strain of avian pox virus, providing vital information to inform future studies on this charismatic and ecologically important group of birds.

Keywords: Trochilidae; avian pox; disease ecology; prevalence; virus.