Drip and Ship versus Mothership Model in the Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke: A Propensity-Matched Real-World Analysis Through National Inpatient Sample Data

Abstract

Background: The superiority of mechanical thrombectomy and intravenous thrombolysis versus intravenous thrombolysis alone for acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusions has been established. This treatment can be organized into 2 models: drip and ship (DS) versus mothership (MS). We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data to compare the outcomes between these models in real-world settings.

Methods: NIS data were queried for 2017-2018 and propensity matching was used to match the differences. Outcomes for each group (disability at discharge and procedural complications) were compared.

Results: A total of 1226 patients were included in analysis (DS, n = 540; MS, n = 686) and groups were matched with respect to age, gender, and comorbidities. A total of 930 patients were included in the final analysis after propensity matching (DS, n = 465, MS, n = 465). The mean age in the DS group was 68.9 years (standard deviation [SD], 14.7) and 69.4 years (SD, 14) in the MS group (P = 0.752). The mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 16.75 (SD, 6.07) in the DS group and 16.54 (SD, 5.99) in the MS group (P = 0.478). At discharge, minimal disability was noted in 22.4% in the DS group versus 26.2% in the MS group (P = 0.293). In-hospital mortality was lower in the MS group (8.8% vs. 7.1%; P = 0.32). The intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) rates were higher in the DS group (ICH, 24.3% vs. 18.7%; IVH, 2.4% vs. 0.9%) (ICH, P = 0.038; IVH, P = 0.068).

Conclusions: Analyzing the efficacy and safety profile of DS versus MS models with the NIS database showed a trend toward better discharge outcomes and lower mortality for the MS group, although it did not reach statistical significance.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Hypertension; IVT; Intracerebral hemorrhage; Mechanical thrombectomy.