Efficacy of a Decision Support Intervention on Decisional Conflict Related to Hepatocellular Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Clin Nurs Res. 2023 Jan;32(1):233-243. doi: 10.1177/10547738221121447. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of decision support intervention on treatment knowledge, decision self-efficacy, decisional conflict, and decision satisfaction in patients with hepatocellular cancer. The study was a randomized controlled trial. In all, 69 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were recruited and randomly assigned to a decision support group or a control group. Data were collected at baseline, post-test, and follow-up using self-report questionnaires. After controlling for baseline scores, the between-group difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) for treatment-related knowledge in post-test scores was 11.9 (6.1, 17.8). After controlling for baseline scores, the between-group difference (95% CI) for decisional conflict was -7.0 (-12.0, -2.0). There was no statistically significant between-group difference in decision self-efficacy and decision satisfaction. Findings supported the efficacy of decision support intervention to improve treatment knowledge and reduce decisional conflict but had no significant effect on decision self-efficacy and decision satisfaction in patients with HCC.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03926039.

Keywords: decision aids; decision support model; hepatocellular carcinoma; self-efficacy.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular* / therapy
  • Conflict, Psychological
  • Decision Making
  • Decision Support Techniques
  • Humans
  • Liver Neoplasms* / therapy

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03926039