The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Interventions on Smoking, Nutrition, Alcohol, Physical Activity and/or Obesity Risk Factors: A Systematic Review

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 30;19(17):10821. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710821.

Abstract

To our knowledge, no systematic reviews have examined the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) interventions across all smoking, nutrition, alcohol, physical activity, and/or obesity (SNAPO) risk factors. This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of VR interventions on reducing SNAPO risks compared to control groups or other interventions. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL were searched to identify eligible studies published to 7 October 2021. Two reviewers independently completed screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Twenty-six studies were included, five on smoking, twelve on physical activity (PA), six on obesity, one on PA and obesity, one on obesity and nutrition, and one on obesity, nutrition and PA. VR was effective for smoking cessation in three studies and for smoking reduction in four studies. Seven studies had significantly higher PA in the VR group, and one study found significantly higher PA in a comparator group. Two studies showed VR was more effective at reducing BMI or weight than comparators. Three multiple health risks studies showed mixed results. The remaining studies found no significant difference between VR and control/comparators. VR appears promising for the treatment of smoking, nutrition, PA, and obesity risks; however, further randomised trials are needed.

Keywords: alcohol; augmented reality; avatar; nutrition; obesity; physical activity; smoking; virtual reality.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Exercise
  • Humans
  • Obesity / prevention & control
  • Smoking / epidemiology
  • Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy*
  • Virtual Reality*

Grants and funding

The School of Medicine and Public Health at the University of Newcastle, Hunter New England Population Health and the Hunter Medical Research Institute provided infrastructure support. Flora Tzelepis was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Career Development Fellowship (APP1143269). The sponsors had no role in study design; in the collection, analyses, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to submit the article for publication.