Maintaining higher grain production with less reactive nitrogen losses in China: A meta-analysis study

Ahmed I Abdo; Yuhao Deng; Daolin Sun; Xuan Chen; Manal A Alnaimy; El-Sayed E A El-Sobky; Hui Wei; Jiaen Zhang

doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116018

Maintaining higher grain production with less reactive nitrogen losses in China: A meta-analysis study

J Environ Manage. 2022 Nov 15:322:116018. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116018. Epub 2022 Sep 5.

Authors

Ahmed I Abdo¹, Yuhao Deng², Daolin Sun², Xuan Chen², Manal A Alnaimy³, El-Sayed E A El-Sobky⁴, Hui Wei⁵, Jiaen Zhang⁶

Affiliations

¹ Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-circular Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China; Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, 44519, Zagazig, Egypt; Department of Ecology, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China; Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Centre of Modern Eco-agriculture and Circular Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
² Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-circular Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China; Department of Ecology, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China; Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Centre of Modern Eco-agriculture and Circular Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
³ Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, 44519, Zagazig, Egypt.
⁴ Agronomy Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, 44511, Zagazig, Egypt.
⁵ Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-circular Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China; Department of Ecology, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China; Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Centre of Modern Eco-agriculture and Circular Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in the Tropics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
⁶ Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-circular Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China; Department of Ecology, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China; Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Centre of Modern Eco-agriculture and Circular Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in the Tropics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China. Electronic address: jeanzh@scau.edu.cn.

PMID: 36067673
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116018

Abstract

Managing reactive nitrogen (Nr) in agricultural production is crucial for addressing the triple challenges of food security, climate change and environmental degradation. Intensive work has been conducted to investigate the effects of mitigation strategies on reducing Nr losses by ammonia emission (Nr-NH₃), nitrous oxide emission (Nr-N₂O) and nitrate leaching (Nr-NO₃^-) separately. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficiency of each strategy in mitigating Nr losses coupled with grain yield responses. The results indicate that producing one Megagram (Mg) of wheat grains caused higher Nr losses, twice that of rice and 17% that of maize. The Nr-NH₃ and Nr-NO₃^- were the dominant sources of Nr losses of the three crops (96%), while Nr-NH₃ only presented 86% of the total Nr losses for rice. Reducing the N rate strategy decreased the yield by 33% and the Nr losses by 62% compared with the conventional rate (150-250 kg N ha^-1) as an average of the three crops. In contrast, increasing the N rate higher than 250 kg N ha^-1 amplified the yield by 15% but also caused a 71% increase in Nr losses compared with the conventional rate. Although subsurface application decreased Nr losses by 5%, this study rejected this approach as an effective strategy due to a 4% yield decline on average of the grain crops. Slow-release fertilizers decreased Nr-NH₃ and Nr-N₂O losses by 41-58% and 54-89%, respectively, of the highest losses under urea in the three crops, but also led to yield reductions. Organic amendments achieved the highest drop in Nr-NO₃^- loss by 66% in maize coupled with yield declines. Biochar increased wheat and maize yields by 0.3 and 0.1 Mg, respectively, coupled with 1 kg reduction in Nr losses. On average, inhibitors augmented the grain yields by 0.2 Mg ha^-1 for each 1 kg decline in Nr losses. In conclusion, for sustainable agricultural intensification, biochar (for wheat only) and inhibitors (for the three crops) are strongly recommended as mitigation strategies for Nr losses from grain crop production systems in China.

Keywords: Ammonia emission; Mitigation strategies; Nitrate leaching; Nitrous oxide; Sustainable agricultural intensification.

Publication types

Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

Agriculture / methods
Ammonia / metabolism
Charcoal
China
Crops, Agricultural / metabolism
Edible Grain / metabolism
Fertilizers* / analysis
Nitrates / metabolism
Nitrogen / analysis
Nitrous Oxide / analysis
Oryza* / metabolism
Soil
Triticum / metabolism
Urea
Zea mays / metabolism

Substances

Fertilizers
Nitrates
Soil
biochar
Charcoal
Ammonia
Urea
Nitrous Oxide
Nitrogen