In the POLARIX trial, pola-R-CHP demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to R-CHOP in untreated intermediate- to high-risk DLBCL. We surveyed practicing clinicians regarding their interpretation of POLARIX, including impressions of efficacy, safety, and cost. Of 174 respondents, most from academic centers (82%) in the United States (57%), 70% stated they would not replace R-CHOP with pola-R-CHP due to insufficient PFS difference, lack of overall survival benefit, and excessive cost. Respondents not recommending pola-R-CHP expressed concerns about financial implications for both society and patients. We observed considerable heterogeneity in both study interpretation and plans for real-world implementation of pola-R-CHP.
Keywords: chemotherapy; clinical trials; lymphomas.
© 2022 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.