Survival and lung function decline in patients with definite, probable and possible idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treated with pirfenidone

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0273854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273854. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Background: There is no clear evidence whether pirfenidone has a benefit in patients with probable or possible UIP, i.e. when idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is diagnosed with a lower degree of diagnostic certainty. We report on outcomes of treatment with pirfenidone in IPF patients diagnosed with various degrees of certainty.

Methods and findings: We followed patients in the multi-national European MultiPartner IPF Registry (EMPIRE) first seen between 2015 and 2018. Patients were assessed with HRCT, histopathology and received a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) IPF diagnosis. Endpoints of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and lung function decline.

Results: A total of 1626 patients were analysed, treated with either pirfenidone (N = 808) or receiving no antifibrotic treatment (N = 818). When patients treated with pirfenidone were compared to patients not receiving antifibrotic treatment, OS (one-, two- and three-year probability of survival 0.871 vs 0.798; 0.728 vs 0.632; 0.579 vs 0.556, P = 0.002), and PFS (one-, two- and three-year probability of survival 0.597 vs 0.536; 0.309 vs 0.281; 0.158 vs 0.148, P = 0.043) was higher, and FVC decline smaller (-0.073 l/yr vs -0.169 l/yr, P = 0.017). The benefit of pirfenidone on OS and PFS was also seen in patients with probable or possible IPF.

Conclusions: This EMPIRE analysis confirms the favourable outcomes observed for pirfenidone treatment in patients with definitive IPF and indicates benefits also for patients with probable or possible IPF.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / pharmacology
  • Humans
  • Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis* / diagnosis
  • Lung
  • Probability
  • Pyridones / pharmacology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vital Capacity

Substances

  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
  • Pyridones
  • pirfenidone

Grants and funding

This study was supported by F. Hofmann-La Roche. The EMPIRE registry is supported by Boehringer Ingelheim and F. Hofmann-La Roche. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.