Addressing the Protease Bias in Quantitative Proteomics

J Proteome Res. 2022 Oct 7;21(10):2526-2534. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00491. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

Abstract

Protein quantification strategies using multiple proteases have been shown to deliver poor interprotease accuracy in label-free mass spectrometry experiments. By utilizing six different proteases with different cleavage sites, this study explores the protease bias and its effect on accuracy and precision by using recombinant protein standards. We established 557 SRM assays, using a recombinant protein standard resource, toward 10 proteins in human plasma and determined their concentration with multiple proteases. The quantified peptides of these plasma proteins spanned 3 orders of magnitude (0.02-70 μM). In total, 60 peptides were used for absolute quantification and the majority of the peptides showed high robustness. The retained reproducibility was achieved by quantifying plasma proteins using spiked stable isotope standard recombinant proteins in a targeted proteomics workflow.

Keywords: SRM; absolute quantification; multiple proteases; plasma proteomics; targeted proteomics.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Blood Proteins / analysis
  • Endopeptidases
  • Humans
  • Isotope Labeling / methods
  • Isotopes
  • Peptide Hydrolases*
  • Peptides / analysis
  • Proteomics* / methods
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Reproducibility of Results

Substances

  • Blood Proteins
  • Isotopes
  • Peptides
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Endopeptidases
  • Peptide Hydrolases