A shocking injury: A clinical review of lightning injuries highlighting pitfalls and a treatment protocol

Injury. 2022 Oct;53(10):3070-3077. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.024. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

Abstract

Introduction: Lightning strikes have high morbidity and mortality rates. Thousands of fatalities are estimated to be caused by lightning worldwide, with the number of injuries being 10 times greater. However, evidence of lightning injuries is restricted to case reports and series and nonsystematic reviews. In this clinical review, we systematically select, score, and present evidence regarding lightning injuries.

Material and methods: We performed a systematic search for reviews and guidelines in the PubMed, Embase (OvidSP), MEDLINE (OvidSP), and Web of Science databases. All publications were scored according to the Levels of Evidence 2 Table of the Oxford center for Evidence-Based Medicine. The reviews were also scored using the scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (SANRA) and guidelines from the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE II).

Results: The search yielded 536 articles. Eventually, 56 articles were included, which consisted of 50 reviews, five guidelines and one overview. The available reviews and guidelines were graded as low to moderate evidence. Most damage from lightning injuries is cardiovascular and neurological, although an individual can experience complications with any of their vital functions. At the scene, initial treatment and resuscitation should focus on those who appear to be dead, which is called the reverse triage system. We proposed an evidence-based treatment protocol for lightning strike patients.

Conclusion: It is vital that every lightning strike patient is treated according to standard trauma guidelines, with a specific focus on the possible sequelae of lighting injuries. All emergency healthcare professionals should acknowledge the risks and particularities of treating lighting strike injuries to optimize the care and outcomes of these patients. Our evidence-based treatment protocol should help prehospital and in-hospital emergency healthcare practitioners to prevent therapeutic mismanagement among these patients.

Keywords: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Lightning burns; Lightning injuries; Reversed triage system; Treatment protocol; Wilderness medicine.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Protocols
  • Humans
  • Lightning Injuries* / complications
  • Lightning Injuries* / prevention & control
  • Lightning*
  • Resuscitation / methods
  • Shock*
  • Triage