A systematic meta-review of patient-level predictors of psychological therapy outcome in major depressive disorder

J Affect Disord. 2022 Nov 15:317:307-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.041. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

Abstract

Background: Psychological therapies are effective for treating major depressive disorder, but current clinical guidelines do not provide guidance on the personalization of treatment choice. Established predictors of psychotherapy treatment response could help inform machine learning models aimed at predicting individual patient responses to different therapy options. Here we sought to comprehensively identify known predictors.

Methods: EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO were searched for systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis published until June 2020 to identify individual patient-level predictors of response to psychological treatments. 3113 abstracts were identified and 300 articles assessed. We qualitatively synthesized our findings by predictor category (sociodemographic; symptom profile; social support; personality features; affective, cognitive, and behavioural; comorbidities; neuroimaging; genetics) and treatment type. We used the AMSTAR 2 to evaluate the quality of included reviews.

Results: Following screening and full-text assessment, 27 systematic reviews including 12 meta-analyses were eligible for inclusion. 74 predictors emerged for various psychological treatments, primarily cognitive behavioural therapy, interpersonal therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy.

Limitations: A paucity of studies examining predictors of psychological treatment outcome, as well as methodological heterogeneities and publication biases limit the strength of the identified predictors.

Conclusions: The synthesized predictors could be used to supplement clinical decision-making in selecting psychological therapies based on individual patient characteristics. These predictors could also be used as a priori input features for machine learning models aimed at predicting a given patient's likelihood of response to different treatment options for depression, and may contribute toward the development of patient-specific treatment recommendations in clinical guidelines.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Evidence-based medicine; Major depressive disorder; Psychotherapy; Systematic reviews; meta-analysis.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
  • Depressive Disorder, Major* / psychology
  • Depressive Disorder, Major* / therapy
  • Humans
  • Mindfulness
  • Psychotherapy* / methods
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic
  • Treatment Outcome