Application of PDCA Circulation Regulation Combined with Nursing Mark in Nursing Safety and Quality Regulation of Disinfection Supply Center

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Aug 16:2022:9253777. doi: 10.1155/2022/9253777. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Objective: A case-control study was conducted to explore the application value of PDCA cycle regulation combined with nursing label in nursing safety and quality regulation in disinfection supply centers.

Methods: The medical staff in the disinfection supply center of our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020 and from January 2021 to December 2021 were included in the control group (routine nursing regulation, n = 13) and the research group (PDCA circulation nursing regulation, n = 13). The differences in quality evaluation, disinfection qualification, quality regulation effect, supply satisfaction, job satisfaction, safety awareness, and comprehensive operation skills of nursing staff were compared, and the application value of PDCA cycle regulation combined with nursing label in nursing safety and quality regulation of disinfection supply center was comprehensively analyzed.

Results: The quality score of nursing staff, and quality evaluation in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The disinfection qualification rate of nurses in the research group was significantly higher, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The effect of device quality supervision in the study group was significantly improved, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The scores of various supervisions in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The safety recognition ability, risk prevention awareness, service awareness, and theory and operation scores of nurses in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse events in the study group was lower, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The satisfaction of the research group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: In summary, the implementation of the PDCA cycle supervision method in the supervision of the sterile supply center in conjunction with the nursing logo is conducive to improving the quality of supervision and sterilization of all work aspects of the sterile supply center, reducing the occurrence of adverse nursing events and promoting the job satisfaction of nurses. In addition, it is conducive to standardizing the operational processes of staff, improving self-learning awareness enhancement, and improving work quality and efficiency.

Publication types

  • Retracted Publication