Average temperatures in the Midwest, USA are predicted to increase 2-9°C by the end of the century; resulting in muddy pastures for spring calving beef heifers as they enter late gestation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of muddy conditions on heifer body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS), conceptus free live weight (CFLW), and fetal growth when heifers were energy restricted during late gestation. Eighteen Angus heifers (n = 9/treatment) were paired based on initial BW. One heifer from each BW pair was randomly allocated to either the mud (MUD) or control (CON) treatment on day 196 of gestation. Pens in the CON treatment were bedded with wood chips, while pens in the MUD treatment were filled with mud (average depth of 19.5 ± 7.9 cm). Heifers were housed individually and fed the same diet that consisted of a limit-fed total mixed ration from day 196 to 266 of gestation that was formulated to meet 66% of the net energy for maintenance, growth, and gestation requirements. Requirements and the amount of the diet offered were adjusted weekly, and heifers were weighed and sampled for blood metabolites weekly. Data were analyzed as a randomized complete block design with repeated measurements. There was a treatment × day of gestation interaction, such that heifers had similar BW, BCS, and CFLW on day 196 of gestation. By day 266 of gestation; however, heifers in the MUD treatment weighed 43.5 kg less (P < 0.01) and were 1.8 BCS units less (P < 0.01) than heifers in the CON treatment. This is further supported by the treatment × day effects we observed for back fat (BF) and rump fat (RF) thickness, such that the MUD heifers had less BF (P = 0.02) and RF (P < 0.01) by day 266 of gestation. There was a marginally significant difference for gestation length (P = 0.06), such that heifers in the MUD treatment calved approximately 3.1 days before the heifers in the CON treatment. Though heifers in the MUD treatment decreased their BW and CFLW during the treatment period, we did not observe a difference in calf birth weight (P = 0.34), calf plasma IgG concentration (P = 0.37), or calf weaning weight (P = 0.63). Despite heifers in the MUD treatment having greater BW, CFLW, and BCS losses compared with the heifers in the CON treatment, the heifers in the MUD treatment seemed to prioritize fetal growth, as they mobilized their body tissues to meet the energetic demands of pregnancy.
Keywords: beef heifers; birth weight; mud; net energy requirements.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.