Comparative effectiveness of larotrectinib versus entrectinib for the treatment of metastatic NTRK gene fusion cancers

J Comp Eff Res. 2022 Oct;11(14):1011-1019. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0247. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

Abstract

Aim: To extrapolate clinical trial results to estimate and compare expected progression-free and overall life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs) for larotrectinib and entrectinib in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and brain metastases prior to treatment with larotrectinib or entrectinib. Methods: A naive direct comparison of larotrectinib versus entrectinib was made using partitioned survival modeling methods from clinical trial data. Results: Larotrectinib resulted in an additional 1.58 LYs (1.17 QALYs), 5.81 LYs (2.02 QALYs) and 1.01 LYs in CRC, STS and baseline brain metastases, respectively, compared with entrectinib. Conclusion: Larotrectinib provided life expectancy and QALY gains compared with entrectinib. Additional studies will be beneficial as more patients are treated and survival data develop to better inform comparative effectiveness results.

Keywords: comparative effectiveness research; oncology; outcomes research.

MeSH terms

  • Benzamides
  • Brain Neoplasms*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Gene Fusion
  • Humans
  • Indazoles
  • Pyrazoles
  • Pyrimidines* / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Benzamides
  • Indazoles
  • Pyrazoles
  • Pyrimidines
  • entrectinib
  • larotrectinib

Grants and funding