High Rate of Radiographic Union at the Fibular Osteotomy Site With No Complications After an Acute Oblique Osteotomy and Ligation Procedure to Shorten the Fibula in High Tibial Osteotomy

Daisuke Ueda; Kazunori Yasuda; Takuma Kaibara; Koji Yabuuchi; Jun Yamaguchi; Jun Onodera; Norimasa Iwasaki; Tomonori Yagi; Eiji Kondo

doi:10.1177/23259671221117480

High Rate of Radiographic Union at the Fibular Osteotomy Site With No Complications After an Acute Oblique Osteotomy and Ligation Procedure to Shorten the Fibula in High Tibial Osteotomy

Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Aug 12;10(8):23259671221117480. doi: 10.1177/23259671221117480. eCollection 2022 Aug.

Authors

Daisuke Ueda¹, Kazunori Yasuda¹, Takuma Kaibara^{1

2}, Koji Yabuuchi¹, Jun Yamaguchi^{1

2}, Jun Onodera¹, Norimasa Iwasaki², Tomonori Yagi¹, Eiji Kondo³

Affiliations

¹ Knee Research Center, Yagi Orthopaedic Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
² Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
³ Center for Sports Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.

Abstract

Background: A fibular shortening osteotomy is needed to perform lateral closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy (LCW-HTO). To achieve this shortening, we have recently developed an acute oblique osteotomy and ligation (AO/L) procedure for the center of the fibular shaft, based on the AO procedure.

Purpose: To compare the 2-year follow-up outcomes between the AO/L procedure and the AO procedure.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: A prospective comparative cohort study was conducted involving 83 patients (83 knees) who underwent shortening osteotomy of the fibula in LCW-HTO between April 2017 and March 2019. The first consecutive 41 knees (AO group) underwent fibular osteotomy with the AO procedure. The remaining 42 knees (AO/L group) underwent fibular osteotomy with the AO/L procedure. All of the patients were evaluated for at least 2 years postoperatively via clinical and radiological assessments. To determine the time needed for complete union at the osteotomy site, we evaluated the radiographs using a radiographic union score for tibial fractures, which was modified for fibular osteotomy. Comparison of outcomes between the 2 groups was performed using the Student t test for continuous variables and the Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher exact test for discrete variables.

Results: Around the fibular osteotomy site, no perioperative complications were found in either group. The radiographic union score was significantly higher in the AO/L group than in the AO group (P < .0001 at 2, 3, and 6 months; P = .0290 at 12 and 24 months). The union rate at the fibular osteotomy site was significantly higher in the AO/L group (97.6%) than in the AO group (82.9%) at 12 months (P = .0290).

Conclusion: The AO/L procedure significantly accelerated the formation of bridging callus at the fibular osteotomy site and provided a significantly higher union rate compared with the AO procedure. Both AO/L and AO procedures were free from perioperative complications. These results suggest that the AO/L procedure is clinically useful as an osteotomy procedure to shorten the fibula in LCW-HTO.

Keywords: complication; fibular osteotomy; high tibial osteotomy; lateral closing wedge; union rate.