Objective: Several limitations are associated with the early diagnosis and treatment of incidental lower-grade glioma (iLGG), and due to its unknown molecular features, its management is categorized as either the "wait-and-see" strategy or immediate treatment. Therefore, in this study the authors explored iLGG's clinical and molecular landscape to improve its management.
Methods: The authors retrospectively assessed the differences between the molecular and clinical characteristics of iLGG and symptomatic lower-grade glioma (sLGG) samples filtered based on symptom data corresponding to The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort with mutations. Thereafter, genomic and transcriptomic analysis was performed.
Results: There was no significant difference between iLGG and sLGG with respect to mutation status; however, there was an increase in the interaction between major mutations in sLGG, depending on the histological subtype and the IDH1 mutation status. Furthermore, the IDH1 mutation characteristics corresponding to wild-type glioma were much more obvious in sLGG than in iLGG. Additionally, in sLGG, genes associated with malignancy, including cell proliferation-related, cell migration-related, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-related, and negative regulation of cell death-related genes, were significantly upregulated, and groups showing higher expression levels of these genes were associated with worse prognosis. Also, 8 of the 75 identified upregulated genes showed positive correlation with resistance to the drugs that are normally used for glioma treatment, including procarbazine, carmustine, vincristine, and temozolomide.
Conclusions: The new insights regarding the different molecular features of iLGG and sLGG indicated that the immediate management of iLGG could result in better prognosis than the wait-and-see strategy.
Keywords: chemoresistance; incidental lower-grade glioma; mutation analysis; oncology; symptomatic lower-grade glioma; transcriptomic analysis.