The effect of orthodontic treatment on facial attractiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Eur J Orthod. 2022 Dec 1;44(6):636-649. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac034.

Abstract

Background: Facial and smile attractiveness are significant motivating factor for patients to seek orthodontic treatment. Although there is a general belief that orthodontic treatment improves facial appearance, this has yet not been systematically evaluated.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the current evidence on the effect of orthodontic treatment on facial attractiveness.

Search methods: Systematic and unrestricted search of nine databases were performed up to January 2022.

Selection criteria: Studies evaluating facial attractiveness before and after orthodontic treatment.

Data collection and analysis: Extracted data included study design and setting, sample size and demographics, malocclusion type, treatment modality, and method for outcome assessment. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies and with RoB-2 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed.

Results: Twenty studies were included in data synthesis; three randomized controlled clinical trials and 17 non-randomized clinical studies of retrospective or prospective design. One of the RCTs was found to have low risk of bias, one presented some concerns and the third showed a high risk of bias. All non-randomized studies showed either unclear or high risk of bias. Data syntheses showed that orthodontic treatment improved facial attractiveness ratings by 9% when compared with untreated controls (MD: 9.05/95% CI: 4.71; 13.39). A combination of orthodontics and orthognathic surgery also showed a positive effect of 5.5% (MD: 5.51/95% CI: 1.55; 9.47) when compared with orthodontic treatment alone. There was no difference in effect between extraction and non-extraction treatments (MD: -0.89/ 95% CI: -8.72; 6.94) or between different types of Class II correctors (MD: 2.21/95% CI: -16.51; 20.93).

Limitations: With the exception of two RCTs, included studies were of unclear or low quality.

Conclusions: Orthodontic treatment has a clinically weak effect on facial attractiveness when compared to no treatment. The same is true when a combined orthodontic/surgical treatment is compared to orthodontics alone.

Registration: PROSPERO #: CRD42020169904.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Malocclusion* / etiology
  • Malocclusion* / therapy
  • Orthodontics*
  • Orthodontics, Corrective / methods
  • Orthognathic Surgery*
  • Orthognathic Surgical Procedures*