Understanding the factors contributing to groundwater salinity in the coastal region of Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract

The present study focused on understanding the factors responsible for groundwater salinity in the coastal region, Prakasam district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Groundwater samples were collected and analysed for pH, EC, TDS, TA, TH, CH, NCH, EA, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, Na⁺, K⁺, HCO₃^-, Cl^-, SO₄^2-, NO₃^-, and F^-. Groundwater quality was assessed using entropy weighted water quality index (EWQI), Chadha and Gibbs diagrams, ionic ratios, chloro-alkaline indices (CA), saturation indices (SI), principal component analysis (PCA), and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA). TDS vs TH indicated that 86% of groundwater samples fall under brackish-cum-very hard water-quality type, while TA and TH relationship showed that 70% and 30% of groundwater samples fall under non‑carbonate hardness (NCH) and excess alkalinity (EA), respectively. EWQI classified groundwater samples into medium (22%), poor (40%), and exremely poor (38%) water quality types, indicating that most samples are not suitable for drinking purposes. Hydrogeochemical types in Chadha diagram showed saline water (Na⁺-Cl^-) type in 92% of groundwater samples. Ionic ratios indicated that anthropogenic activities resulting from the leaching of surface water pollutants are the main source of groundwater pollution. Base ion exchange was indicated as the main process in CA indices. SI revealed precipitation of the calcite phase and dissolution of the gypsum and halite phases in groundwater. Evaporation appeared in Gibb's diagram as a primary process rather than a geogenic origin. PC1 (Na⁺, Cl^-, SO₄^2-, Mg²⁺, K⁺, and NO₃^-) and PC2 (HCO₃^- and F^-) were considered salinity-process and alkalinity-process, respectively. The main sources of salinity in groundwater are brackish-water aquaculture and salt-making activities with household waste, septic tank spills, irrigation-return-flows, and chemical fertilizers being secondary sources. HCA classified groundwater samples into Group-I (46%), which represents domestic water, agricultural activities, etc., Group-II (30.24%), which shows the influence of both Group-I and Group-II, and Group-III (23.76%), which specifies brackish-water aquaculture and salt-making activities. Consequently, the present study obviously indicated that the groundwater quality of anthropogenic origin has largely overcome the influence of geogenic sources. The EWQI classification spatially delineated the study region into medium, high, and very high vulnerable zones, covering 28.69%, 32.75%, and 38.56%, respectively. Therefore, it is suggested to control the dumping of domestic waste and septic tank leaks, limit irrigation-return-flows and chemical fertilizers, ban brackish water aquaculture and salt production activities, and strictly implement an aquifer recharge management strategy to ensure human health. This study will assist decision-makers in addressing groundwater salinity issues in coastal regions.

Keywords: Coastal region; EWQI; Groundwater; Ionic ratios; Salinity; Statistical analysis.