Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a heterogeneous, life-threatening clinical syndrome. There are scarce data on the quality of care in HLH or data comparing treatment patterns and outcomes between different triggers. We aimed to examine quality-of-care indicators and outcomes in adults with various HLH triggers. In this multi-centre retrospective cohort study of adult HLH in the province of Alberta, Canada (1999-2019), we examined quality indicators including diagnostic testing, time to diagnosis and treatment and trigger identification. We also compared treatment regimens and outcomes across HLH triggers. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of etoposide use. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We identified 97 patients; 66 (68%) were male. Triggers included malignancy (36%), infection (35%), autoimmune disease (21%) and idiopathic/others (8%). Specialized tests such as sCD25 (53%) and natural killer degranulation assay (19%) were under-performed, as were testing for infectious triggers. Etoposide was administered in only 33 (34%). Neutropenia, hyperbilirubinemia and hyperferritinemia, but not age, sex and comorbidities, were significant predictors of etoposide use. At median follow-up of 32 months, median OS was 18.8 months. Worse OS was seen in malignancy-associated and idiopathic HLH (log-rank P < 0.001). Our study showed low rates of specialized testing such as sCD25 and a low rate of etoposide use. Development of a standardized provincial protocol has the potential to improve quality of care in adult HLH.
Keywords: Etoposide; Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; Mortality; Quality improvement.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.