Novel Driver Strength Index highlights important cancer genes in TCGA PanCanAtlas patients

PeerJ. 2022 Aug 11:10:e13860. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13860. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Background: Cancer driver genes are usually ranked by mutation frequency, which does not necessarily reflect their driver strength. We hypothesize that driver strength is higher for genes preferentially mutated in patients with few driver mutations overall, because these few mutations should be strong enough to initiate cancer.

Methods: We propose formulas for the Driver Strength Index (DSI) and the Normalized Driver Strength Index (NDSI), the latter independent of gene mutation frequency. We validate them using TCGA PanCanAtlas datasets, established driver prediction algorithms and custom computational pipelines integrating SNA, CNA and aneuploidy driver contributions at the patient-level resolution.

Results: DSI and especially NDSI provide substantially different gene rankings compared to the frequency approach. E.g., NDSI prioritized members of specific protein families, including G proteins GNAQ, GNA11 and GNAS, isocitrate dehydrogenases IDH1 and IDH2, and fibroblast growth factor receptors FGFR2 and FGFR3. KEGG analysis shows that top NDSI-ranked genes comprise EGFR/FGFR2/GNAQ/GNA11-NRAS/HRAS/KRAS-BRAF pathway, AKT1-MTOR pathway, and TCEB1-VHL-HIF1A pathway.

Conclusion: Our indices are able to select for driver gene attributes not selected by frequency sorting, potentially for driver strength. Genes and pathways prioritized are likely the strongest contributors to cancer initiation and progression and should become future therapeutic targets.

Keywords: Cancer; Driver; Genes; Mutations; Pathways.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Mutation / genetics
  • Mutation Rate
  • Neoplasms* / genetics
  • Oncogenes* / genetics
  • Proteins / genetics

Substances

  • Proteins

Grants and funding

Aleksey V. Belikov received MIPT 5-100 program support for early career researchers. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.