Interspecific variation in the temperature response of mesophyll conductance is related to leaf anatomy

Plant J. 2022 Oct;112(1):221-234. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15942. Epub 2022 Sep 5.

Abstract

Although mesophyll conductance (gm ) is known to be sensitive to temperature (T), the mechanisms underlying the temperature response of gm are not fully understood. In particular, it has yet to be established whether interspecific variation in gm -T relationships is associated with mesophyll anatomy and vein traits. In the present study, we measured the short-term response of gm in eight crop species, and leaf water potential (Ψleaf ) in five crop species over a temperature range of 15-35°C. The considered structural parameters are surface areas of mesophyll cells and chloroplasts facing intercellular airspaces per unit leaf area (Sm and Sc ), cell wall thickness (Tcw ), and vein length per area (VLA). We detected large interspecific variations in the temperature responses of gm and Ψleaf . The activation energy for gm (Ea,gm ) was found to be positively correlated with Sc , although it showed no correlation with Tcw . In contrast, VLA was positively correlated with the slope of the linear model of Ψleaf -T (a), whereas Ea,gm was marginally correlated with VLA and a. A two-component model was subsequently used to model gm -T relationships, and the mechanisms underlying the temperature response of gm are discussed. The data presented here indicate that leaf anatomy is a major determinant of the interspecific variation in gm -T relationships.

Keywords: crop plants; leaf hydraulic conductance; leaf structure; leaf water potential; mesophyll conductance.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Carbon Dioxide
  • Mesophyll Cells* / physiology
  • Photosynthesis*
  • Plant Leaves / physiology
  • Temperature
  • Water

Substances

  • Water
  • Carbon Dioxide