Association Between EGFR and ALK Mutation Status on Patient-Reported Symptoms After Palliative Radiation for Bone Pain in NSCLC

Daegan Sit; Michelle Bale; Vincent Lapointe; Robert Olson; Fred Hsu

doi:10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100371

Association Between EGFR and ALK Mutation Status on Patient-Reported Symptoms After Palliative Radiation for Bone Pain in NSCLC

JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022 Jun 24;3(8):100371. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100371. eCollection 2022 Aug.

Authors

Daegan Sit^{1

2}, Michelle Bale^{1

2}, Vincent Lapointe^{1

2}, Robert Olson^{1

3}, Fred Hsu^{1

4}

Affiliations

¹ Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
² BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
³ BC Cancer Prince George, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
⁴ BC Cancer Abbotsford Centre, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada.

Abstract

Introduction: After palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases from NSCLC, up to 30% of patients may derive no symptomatic benefit, and there are a lack of biological predictors for this. The purpose was to investigate whether EGFR and ALK genetic rearrangements were associated with greater rates of pain response to palliative radiotherapy.

Methods: Patients were identified from a prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes database for all patients with lung cancer treated with conventional palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases from 2013 to 2016 in the province of British Columbia. Patients were divided on the basis of mutational status into the following: EGFR and ALK wild type (WT), EGFR mutation present (EGFR+), or ALK mutation present (ALK+). Patient-reported outcomes of global pain severity were collected before and after radiotherapy and on an ordinal scale of 0 to 4, with 0 representing no bone pain and 4 representing the maximal possible bone pain. The primary outcome was the rate of partial pain response (any improvement in score), and the secondary outcome was the rate of complete pain response (final pain score of 0). Stepwise, multivariable logistic analysis was used to compare response rates between treatment courses for different mutational statuses.

Results: The final cohort consisted of 388 treatment courses for 329 unique patients. For the WT, EGFR+, and ALK+ groups, there were 180, 63, and nine treatment courses, respectively. There were 92 patients with no ALK and EGFR testing. The most common treatment fractionations were 8 Gy in one fraction (188 of 388) and 20 Gy in five fractions (160 of 388), and use of multifraction radiotherapy did not differ between mutation status groups (p = 0.3). Partial pain response rates were as follows: WT 63%, EGFR+ 75%, and ALK+ 78%. On multivariable analysis, rates of partial response were higher for EGFR+ (OR = 5.4, p < 0.001) and for ALK+ (OR = 12.8, p = 0.008) in comparison to WT. Complete response rates were as follows: WT 20.5%, EGFR+ 35%, and ALK+ 67%. On multivariable analysis, complete response was not significantly increased in EGFR+ compared with WT (OR = 1.6, p = 0.127). ALK+ mutation status was associated with a higher rate of complete response compared with WT (OR = 5.2, p = 0.031).

Conclusions: There was an association between EGFR+ and ALK+ tumors and increased rates of partial pain response to palliative radiotherapy.

Keywords: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase receptor, Bone metastases; Epidermal growth factor receptor; Non–small cell lung cancer; Palliative radiotherapy; Patient reported outcomes.