Evaluation of critical risk factors in the implementation of modular construction

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 8;17(8):e0272448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272448. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Modular construction is considered as a preferred construction method over conventional construction due to a number of benefits including reduction in project completion time, improved environmental performance, better quality, enhanced workers' safety and flexibility. However, successful implementation of modular construction is hindered by various risk factors and uncertainties. Therefore, it is imperative to perform a comprehensive risk assessment of critical risk factors that pose a negative impact on the implementation of modular construction. Moreover, there is also a relatively less rate of modular construction adoption in developing countries, highlighting the need to focus more on underdeveloped regions. This study aims to propose a risk assessment framework for identification, evaluation and prioritization of critical risk factors affecting the implementation of modular construction in Pakistan. 20 risk factors were identified from previous literature which were then evaluated to shortlist the most significant risks using Fuzzy Delphi. The most significant risk factors were then prioritized using a novel Full-Consistency Method (FUCOM). The results specified 'Inadequate skills and experience in modular construction', 'Inadequate capacity of modular manufacturers' and 'Inability to make changes in design during the construction stage' as top three critical risks in the implementation of modular construction. This is the first study to propose a risk assessment framework for modular construction in Pakistan. The results of the study are useful to provide insights to construction industry practitioners in highlighting and eliminating risks involved in modular construction planning and execution.

MeSH terms

  • Construction Industry*
  • Humans
  • Occupational Health*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Uncertainty

Grants and funding

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.