Electomyographic activities of shoulder muscles during Handwheelchair.Q vs pushrim wheelchair propulsion

Abstract

Different mechanisms of force transmission have been developed for the movement of wheelchairs, from the standard pushrim propulsion to the handbike. Contributing to this repertoire, we recently developed a system of propulsion based on a pulley-cable mechanism, the Handwheelchair.Q. In contrast to other propulsion systems, the Handwheelchair.Q requires users to extend the shoulders and flex the elbows to move the wheelchair forward, mimicking the rowing gesture. Whether however our proposed, propulsion system imposes a similar degree of shoulder muscles excitation with respect to the conventional, pushrim system is yet to be addressed. In this study we therefore assess whether the Handwheelchair.Q demands a similar degree and timing of muscle excitation with respect to the pushrim wheelchair, for a given travelled distance. We address this issue by sampling the angular speed of the two wheels and the surface EMGs from ten, shoulder muscles, while seven subjects use the two propulsion systems at constantly low and high speeds, one at a time. As expected, results revealed opposite muscle groups were excited when comparing the two mechanisms for wheelchair propulsion. ANOVA statistics indicated the amplitude of EMGs was greater for shoulder flexors and elbow extensors during the drive phase of pushrim propulsion, with the opposite being observed for the Handwheelchair.Q. Interestingly, from the angular speed we observed a significantly greater average displacement was achieved with the Handwheelchair.Q. Our results support therefore the notion that, with respect to pushrim propulsion, subjects were able to move faster without overloading the shoulder muscle with the Handwheelchair.Q.

Keywords: Cable pulley wheelchair; Electromyography; Manual wheelchair; Spinal cord injury.