Activity of cefiderocol, imipenem/relebactam, cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/zidebactam against ceftolozane/tazobactam- and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Sep 30;77(10):2809-2815. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac241.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the activity of cefiderocol, imipenem/relebactam, cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/zidebactam against a clinical and laboratory collection of ceftolozane/tazobactam- and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa β-lactamase mutants.

Methods: The activity of cefiderocol, imipenem/relebactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam and comparators was evaluated against a collection of 30 molecularly characterized ceftolozane/tazobactam- and/or ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from patients previously treated with cephalosporins. To evaluate how the different β-lactamases in the clinical isolates affected the resistance to these agents, a copy of each blaPDC, blaOXA-2 and blaOXA-10 ancestral and mutant allele from the clinical isolates was cloned in pUCp24 and expressed in dual blaPDC-oprD (for blaPDC-like genes) or single oprD (for blaOXA-2-like and blaOXA-10-like genes) PAO1 knockout mutants. MICs were determined using reference methodologies.

Results: For all isolates, MICs were higher than 4 and/or 8 mg/L for ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam, respectively. Cefiderocol was the most active agent, showing activity against all isolates, except one clinical isolate that carried an R504C substitution in PBP3 (MIC = 16 mg/L). Imipenem/relebactam was highly active against all isolates, except two clinical isolates that carried the VIM-20 carbapenemase. Cefepime/zidebactam and cefepime/taniborbactam displayed activity against most of the isolates, but resistance was observed in some strains with PBP3 amino acid substitutions or that overexpressed mexAB-oprM or mexXY efflux pumps. Evaluation of transformants revealed that OXA-2 and OXA-10 extended-spectrum variants cause a 2-fold increase in the MIC of cefiderocol relative to parental enzymes.

Conclusions: Cefiderocol, imipenem/relebactam, cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/zidebactam show promising and complementary in vitro activity against ceftolozane/tazobactam- and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant P. aeruginosa. These agents may represent potential therapeutic options for ceftolozane/tazobactam- and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant P. aeruginosa infections.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Azabicyclo Compounds / pharmacology
  • Azabicyclo Compounds / therapeutic use
  • Borinic Acids
  • Carboxylic Acids
  • Cefepime / pharmacology
  • Cefepime / therapeutic use
  • Cefiderocol
  • Ceftazidime* / pharmacology
  • Ceftazidime* / therapeutic use
  • Cephalosporins / pharmacology
  • Cephalosporins / therapeutic use
  • Cyclooctanes
  • Humans
  • Imipenem / pharmacology
  • Imipenem / therapeutic use
  • Piperidines
  • Pseudomonas Infections* / drug therapy
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa / genetics
  • Tazobactam / pharmacology
  • Tazobactam / therapeutic use
  • beta-Lactamases / genetics

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Azabicyclo Compounds
  • Borinic Acids
  • Carboxylic Acids
  • Cephalosporins
  • Cyclooctanes
  • Piperidines
  • WCK 5222
  • ceftolozane, tazobactam drug combination
  • zidebactam
  • ceftolozane
  • Imipenem
  • avibactam
  • Cefepime
  • taniborbactam
  • Ceftazidime
  • beta-Lactamases
  • Tazobactam
  • relebactam