Comparing Environmental Policies to Reduce Pharmaceutical Pollution and Address Disparities

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;19(14):8292. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148292.

Abstract

Pharmaceutical products, including active pharmaceutical ingredients and inactive ingredients such as packaging materials, have raised significant concerns due to their persistent input and potential threats to human and environmental health. Discourse on reducing pharmaceutical waste and subsequent pollution is often limited, as information about the toxicity of pharmaceuticals in humans is yet to be fully established. Nevertheless, there is growing awareness about ecotoxicity, and efforts to curb pharmaceutical pollution in the European Union (EU), United States (US), and Canada have emerged along with waste disposal and treatment procedures, as well as growing concerns about impacts on human and animal health, such as through antimicrobial resistance. Yet, the outcomes of such endeavors are often disparate and involve multiple agencies, organizations, and departments with little evidence of cooperation, collaboration, or oversight. Environmental health disparities occur when communities exposed to a combination of poor environmental quality and social inequities experience more sickness and disease than wealthier, less polluted communities. In this paper, we discuss pharmaceutical environmental pollution in the context of health disparities and examine policies across the US, EU, and Canada in minimizing environmental pollution.

Keywords: disparities; environmental policies; pharmaceutical pollution; pharmaceutical waste.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Environmental Health
  • Environmental Policy*
  • Environmental Pollution* / prevention & control
  • European Union
  • Humans
  • Pharmaceutical Preparations
  • United States

Substances

  • Pharmaceutical Preparations

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.