Objective: To evaluate the impact of reducing the radiographic field of view (FOV) on the trueness and precision of the alignment between cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanning data for implant planning.
Materials and methods: Fifteen participants presenting with one of three clinical scenarios: single tooth loss (ST, n = 5), multiple missing teeth (MT, n = 5) and presence of radiographic artifacts (AR, n = 5) were included. CBCT volumes covering the full arch (FA) were reduced to the quadrant (Q) or the adjacent tooth/teeth (A). Two operators, an expert (exp) in virtual implant planning and an inexperienced clinician, performed multiple superimpositions, with FA-exp serving as a reference. The deviations were calculated at the implant apex and shoulder levels. Thereafter, linear mixed models were adapted to investigate the influence of FOV on discrepancies.
Results: Evaluation of trueness compared to FA-exp resulted in the largest mean (AR-A: 0.10 ± 0.33 mm) and single maximum discrepancy (AR-Q: 1.44 mm) in the presence of artifacts. Furthermore, for the ST group, the largest mean error (-0.06 ± 0.2 mm, shoulder) was calculated with the FA-FOV, while for MT, with the intermediate volume (-0.07 ± 0.24 mm, Q). In terms of precision, the mean SD intervals were ≤0.25 mm (A-exp). Precision was influenced by FOV volume (FA < Q < A) but not by operator expertise.
Conclusions: For single posterior missing teeth, an extended FOV does not improve registration accuracy. However, in the presence of artifacts or multiple missing posterior teeth, caution is recommended when reducing FOV.
Keywords: ALADA; ALARA; CBCT; FOV; guided implantology; virtual planning.
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.