The safety problem of traditional Chinese medicine containing aristolochic acid is of great concern in China and abraod, which poses a challenge in clinical application and supervision. There are many types of aristolochic acid analogues(AAAs) and 178 have been reported. According to the structure, they are classified into aristolochic acids(AAs) and aristololactams(ALs). The toxi-city is remarkably different among AAAs of different types. For example, AA-Ⅰ has strong nephrotoxicity and carcinogenicity, and the toxicity of AA-Ⅱ is lower than that of AA-Ⅰ. Besides, AA-Ⅳa and AA-Ⅰa are considered to have no obvious nephrotoxicity and carcinogenicity. The types and content of AAAs are significantly different among traditional Chinese medicines derived from different Aristolochiaceae species. For example, Asari Radix et Rhizoma and Aristolochiae Herba mainly consist of AAAs without obvious toxicity(such as AA-Ⅳa). The content of AAAs in compound preparations is related to the proportions of the medicinals and the processing method. The content of AA-Ⅰ in some compound preparations is very low or below the detection limit. Therefore, the author concludes that AAAs of different types have different toxicity, but not all AAAs has nephrotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Moreover, the toxicity of traditional Chinese medicines containing AAAs should not be generalized and AA-Ⅰ and AA-Ⅱ should be emphasized. In this paper, it is suggested that traditional Chinese medicine containing AAAs should be used rationally and research, analysis, and toxicological study of AAAs species and content should be strengthened. In addition, limit standards of AA-Ⅰ and AA-Ⅱ should be formulated and science-based supervision should be performed.
Keywords: aristolochic acid analogues; carcinogenicity; nephrotoxicity; standard limit; supervisory suggestions.