Impact of Insurer on Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Outcomes, Stage, and Treatment Modalities

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023 Jun;132(6):692-697. doi: 10.1177/00034894221111250. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

Abstract

Background: While the impact of insurance has been described for thyroid cancer as a whole, we sought to further characterize this relationship for the papillary sub-group (PTC).

Methods: Those patients with primary site thyroid tumors from 2007 to 2016 with histology-confirmed PTC were extracted from the SEER database. These parameters yielded 103 219 participants for demographic, extent of disease, and treatment parameter study and 103 025 for outcome studies.

Results: Compared to their counterparts, those with Medicaid were more likely to have stage T3 or greater (<.0001) disease at presentation. Those with Medicare/private insurance were more likely to have No staging at diagnosis (P < .0001). Similarly, those with Medicaid exhibited poorer overall (98.0%, 90.9%, 81.6% vs 98.9%, 95.0%, 90.0%; P < .0001) and cause-specific (99.3%, 98.0%, 95.8% vs 99.7%, 99.1%, 98.4%; P < .0001) survival after 1, 5, and 9 years respectively.

Conclusion: Insurer has a significant impact on the stage at diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma while having limited effect on the treatment modalities offered. Statistically significant overall and cause-specific mortality differences were appreciated but are likely clinical insignificant. Further work to elucidate the social factors likely affecting these patients is warranted.

Keywords: clinical outcomes research; head and neck endocrine surgery; papillary thyroid cancer; thyroid cancer; treatment outcomes.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Papillary* / diagnosis
  • Humans
  • Insurance Carriers
  • Medicare
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Thyroid Cancer, Papillary / therapy
  • Thyroid Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Thyroidectomy
  • United States / epidemiology